Archive for December, 2010

SCHIZOPHRENIA AND ALTERED STATES: ALTERED STATES AND THE HYPNOTIC PROCESSES

Wednesday, December 29th, 2010
Hypnosis, one of the ancestors of modern psychology, is a method of altering states of consciousness or, rather, for getting around consciousness and accessing unconscious secondary processes. Spontaneous alterations of consciousness (i.e., of the primary process) as they occur in schizophrenia where the secondary process becomes primary and the earlier primary one becomes secondary are natural and meaningful conditions which one frequently finds in psychology and medicine. The following illustrate some examples of various processes which operate in hypnotic-like fashion. Seeing that these states occur in all of us will enable us to gain a greater appreciation for the reversals which occur in schizophrenia.
BECOMING A HYPNOTIST
A hypnotist can control, in Herr B.’s mind at least, the states of consciousness which he is subjected to. Hence, his interest in becoming a hypnotist is similar to the drive to become a psychiatrist or psychologist; one wants to understand and control what happens. If Herr BC does not learn how to do it consciously, then he will unconsciously slip into becoming a healer or a Jesus figure. Thus, in his normal state, the way he is now, he is asking for integration , of the experiences he had when he was in a psychotic episode.
*62\227\8*

SCHIZOPHRENIA AND ALTERED STATES: ALTERED STATES AND THE HYPNOTIC PROCESSESHypnosis, one of the ancestors of modern psychology, is a method of altering states of consciousness or, rather, for getting around consciousness and accessing unconscious secondary processes. Spontaneous alterations of consciousness (i.e., of the primary process) as they occur in schizophrenia where the secondary process becomes primary and the earlier primary one becomes secondary are natural and meaningful conditions which one frequently finds in psychology and medicine. The following illustrate some examples of various processes which operate in hypnotic-like fashion. Seeing that these states occur in all of us will enable us to gain a greater appreciation for the reversals which occur in schizophrenia.BECOMING A HYPNOTISTA hypnotist can control, in Herr B.’s mind at least, the states of consciousness which he is subjected to. Hence, his interest in becoming a hypnotist is similar to the drive to become a psychiatrist or psychologist; one wants to understand and control what happens. If Herr BC does not learn how to do it consciously, then he will unconsciously slip into becoming a healer or a Jesus figure. Thus, in his normal state, the way he is now, he is asking for integration , of the experiences he had when he was in a psychotic episode.*62\227\8*

AREN’T WE ALL CONCERNED WITH HOW WE LOOK? GETTING DOWN ON YOURSELF

Friday, December 17th, 2010
People with BDD tend to feel negatively about themselves as a person because of their appearance flaws. As item 3 on Table 11 shows, people with BDD report that the perceived appearance defect has a fairly big influence on how they judge themselves as a person in a nonphysical sense (for example, thinking that the appearance flaws make them uninteresting or undesirable). They also say that the appearance defect is important to how they judge themselves as a person in comparison to other personal characteristics such as their personality, intelligence, life values, and ability at work. However, people with BDD tend to believe that other people judge them only slightly negatively as a person because of their defect. So people with BDD seem to judge themselves more harshly and negatively as a person than they think other people do.
It’s interesting that while the perceived appearance defect has a fairly strong influence on how people with BDD evaluate themselves as a person, Dr. Veale found that most people with BDD judge other people on the basis of many factors, rather than appearance. In a similar vein, Dr. Wilhelm found that when rating the attractiveness of photos, including their own, people with BDD underestimated their own attractiveness and overestimated the attractiveness of beautiful faces. Taken together, these findings suggest that people with BDD are harder on themselves than they are on others. This might be expected to fuel anxiety, depression, shame, and low self-esteem, which in turn may further amplify negative evaluation of oneself and appearance preoccupations.
*218\204\8*

AREN’T WE ALL CONCERNED WITH HOW WE LOOK? GETTING DOWN ON YOURSELF People with BDD tend to feel negatively about themselves as a person because of their appearance flaws. As item 3 on Table 11 shows, people with BDD report that the perceived appearance defect has a fairly big influence on how they judge themselves as a person in a nonphysical sense (for example, thinking that the appearance flaws make them uninteresting or undesirable). They also say that the appearance defect is important to how they judge themselves as a person in comparison to other personal characteristics such as their personality, intelligence, life values, and ability at work. However, people with BDD tend to believe that other people judge them only slightly negatively as a person because of their defect. So people with BDD seem to judge themselves more harshly and negatively as a person than they think other people do.It’s interesting that while the perceived appearance defect has a fairly strong influence on how people with BDD evaluate themselves as a person, Dr. Veale found that most people with BDD judge other people on the basis of many factors, rather than appearance. In a similar vein, Dr. Wilhelm found that when rating the attractiveness of photos, including their own, people with BDD underestimated their own attractiveness and overestimated the attractiveness of beautiful faces. Taken together, these findings suggest that people with BDD are harder on themselves than they are on others. This might be expected to fuel anxiety, depression, shame, and low self-esteem, which in turn may further amplify negative evaluation of oneself and appearance preoccupations.*218\204\8*

ALLERGY SHOTS: HIGHLY QUESTIONABLE IMMUNOTHERAPY PROCEDURES

Tuesday, December 7th, 2010

There are a variety of unproven methods of administering immunotherapy being given patients today. These controversial methods are practiced almost exclusively by physicians who are not specialists in allergy and immunology, a comment that should speak for itself. So, if immunotherapy has been recommended for you or your child, ask questions:
- Is the physician providing the immunotherapy a specialist in allergy and immunology?
- If not, is there such a specialist in your area?
- Is the physician providing the immunotherapy using a method considered unproven or controversial by most allergy specialists? (Those using such methods ate fully aware of their unproven or controversial nature.)
- What are the reasons that the physician is recommending an unproven or controversial mode of treatment rather than using a scientifically proven method?
- What are the reasons that you or your children are not being referred to a properly trained specialist for consultation before such is undertaken?
This is no time to be bashful. Immunotherapy is an expensive, time-consuming form of therapy. Ask questions. If you are going to receive a controversial form of therapy, you deserve to know that it is considered controversial. So, get answers. It is only through asking questions and receiving answers that you will be able to make an informed decision regarding the recommended immunotherapy plan.
Unproven methods can be offered for several reasons, none of which are very flattering to the profession of medicine. First, neither the vulnerable public nor most of the non-allergist medical world have any ideas which methods are considered proven and which are not. Second, fear of restraint-of-trade lawsuits by physicians who employ unproven methods prevents local, state, and national medical societies that are aware of these problems from acting on their concerns. Third, federal regulations (imposed by the Federal Trade Commission) make it very difficult, if not impossible, for the medical profession to properly control the actions of its members. Unfortunately, it is the patients who suffer from all of this confusion.
*57/322/5*